Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst[PDF])
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1096348007309570v1
32/1/89    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mattila, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ro, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
First published on November 30, 2007, doi:10.1177/1096348007309570

Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 2008;32:89.

A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2008
© 2007 ICHRIE

Article

Discrete Negative Emotions and Customer Dissatisfaction Responses in a Casual Restaurant Setting

Anna S. Mattila1* and Heejung Ro, Ph.D.2

1 Pennsylvania State University
2 University of Central Florida, Orlando

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: asm6{at}psu.edu.


   Abstract
The primary purpose of this study is to investigate customers’ emotional responses following a service failure in a restaurant setting. Specifically, this study investigates how specific emotions (anger, disappointment or regret, worry) influence consumers’ behavioral intentions. To gain a richer understanding of consumers’ coping behaviors, the authors examine customers’ locus of failure attributions. By using a 3 x 2 factorial between-subjects design, three attribution types (internal, external, and control condition) are matched with two service recovery outcomes (positive and negative). Findings suggest that customers with feelings of anger and disappointment or regret are likely to engage in various dissatisfaction responses (e.g., direct complaining, negative word-of-mouth, and switching), whereas worried customers are not. Attributing the failure to internal or external causes reduce switching and negative word-of-mouth intentions. Finally, the study results indicate that feelings of anger spill over to postrecovery satisfaction.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?