Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laroche, M.
Right arrow Articles by Parsa, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, Vol. 24, No. 2, 199-222 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/109634800002400205
© 2000 ICHRIE

Brand Management in Hospitality: An Empirical Test of the Brisoux-Laroche Model

Michel Laroche

Concordia University, laroche{at}vax2.concordia.ca

H. G. Parsa

Ohio State University, parsa.1{at}osu.edu

Consumers’ brand selection process, purchase behavior, and their impact on brand management are least understood in the hospitality literature. This problem is complicated further by the fact that many hospitality companies prefer to develop and manage multiple brands for growth purposes. This study explores the selection process adopted by consumers in choosing a hospitality brand in multibrand situations. The Brisoux-Laroche’s (B-L) consumer behavior model of brand categorization was tested with 16 quick service restaurant brands. The B-L model was supported empirically. Further support for the model was provided by the assessment of net utility values for quality and price for the included brands. Results indicated that consumers use evoked, hold, foggy, and reject set in categorizing the available brands. Each of the awareness sets was further analyzed according to three subgroups of brands: leading, intermediate, and low market share. The findings supported the independent nature of these subgroups. Results are discussed in light of brand management in the hospitality field, and consumers’ brand choice process and managerial implications are presented.

Key Words: consumer behavior • brand categorization • quick service restaurants • brand management • levels of awareness • hospitality


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?